February 18, 2010

American Charities Raise $774-Million for Haiti

Five weeks after the devastating earthquake in Haiti donors have contributed more than $774-million to support relief efforts.

Aid to Haiti got a big lift from a star-studded telethon that was broadcast on major television networks in January. Donations made in response to the telethon totaled $66-million, and organizers awarded $35-million in grants on February 5.

The biggest player - the American Red Cross, which had raised approximately $276-million as of February 16, including $6-million from last month’s Hope for Haiti telethon. More than $32-million was pledged to the Red Cross via text message. But churches and faith-based organizations we're a huge component of total as well. Among the results:
  • Adventist Development and Relief Agency has raised $3.2-million.
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee has raised approximately $5.5-million
  • American Jewish World Service has raised $5-million for its Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund.
  • Catholic Medical Mission Board has raised $1.3-million in cash and donations medicines and medical supplies worth $10.6-million.
  • Catholic Relief Services has secured $60.4-million in gifts and pledges.
  • Habitat for Humanity has raised $2.3-million.
  • Lutheran World Relief has raised more than $3.2-million.
  • Mennonite Central Committee has raised more than $3.2-million from donors in the United States, and another $5.1-million in Canada.
  • Mercy Corps has received $11.6-million.
  • The Salvation Army has raised $10.8-million.
  • Save the Children USA has raised $18.2-million, and another $48-million from its international affiliates.
  • The United Methodist Committee on Relief has raised $11-million.
  • World Vision’s U.S. operations has received $27.6-million in cash.
Powerful philanthropy at work!

February 2, 2010

Three Ways to Deal with a Difficult Budget

An updated economic survey from The National Association of Church Business Administration (NACBA) has found even more churches struggling in the economic downturn. At the end of 2008, only 14 percent of survey respondents said their church was definitely having economy-related financial difficulties. In the last quarter of 2009, that number had risen to almost 35 percent - or 1 in 3 churches!

In response to the challenges, 47 percent said their church had frozen or reduced staff benefits (up from 18 percent in 2008). 20 percent had laid off staff, and 26 percent had postponed a major capital project.

But are staff cuts or capital project postponements the best ways to deal with difficult financial times and a shrinking budget? How else can churches survive the recession? Consider these three options:

#1: Slash the budget strategically.

Funding programs and ministries that have little, if anything, to do with a church's primary mission and vision can unnecessarily strain both financial resources and human resources. It can also lead to a decline as congregants realize that rather than paying for progress in the church’s mission to make disciples, they are funding an organization.

Steve Stroope and Dr. Aubrey Malphurs stress that churchesmust identify their core values, their mission, a clear vision and a strategy for accomplishing that vision before they approach the budgeting process. "Without a clear vision, values, and a strategy, you’ll not be able to develop a strategic budget," Malphurs and Stroope write in their book "Money Matters in Church."

They also caution churches against simply increasing the budget, despite a downturn in giving, under the mistaken assumption that people will rise to the occasion and make up for the previous deficit with newfound generosity. In fact, rather than relying on percentage increases in giving to set yearly budgets, Stroope and Malphurs recommend using the pattern of numerical increase only as a more conservative tool. For example, an annual budget of $200,000 that winds up with a $30,000 surplus would be used to increase the budget by $30,000, but only in the following year.

#2: Create an optimal staff size.

The largest single budget item for any church is its staff. Paid ministry personnel eat up the largest share of a church’s funds. On average, salaries and wages comprise 38 percent of church operating budgets. When asked what options they have considered to reduce expenses this year, 20 percent of churches say they have implemented salary freezes, followed by hiring freezes, pay cuts and layoffs.

Larger churches naturally require larger staffs. According to Tim Keller, senior pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York, NY, "This creates a great burden on large churches, because unless you have a wealthy congregation, you can’t add staff as fast as you need to." The answer, he says, lies in a competent volunteer recruitment. A large and growing church must learn to depend more on lay ministry.

This means more decision making is left up to the staff and more basic pastoral ministry, as well as shepherding, teaching, and discipling is in the hands of volunteers. "In summary, in small churches policy is decided by many, and ministry is done by a few. In large churches ministry is done by many, and policy is decided by a few," Keller writes.

#3: Trim the fat.

A lot of large church budget items can be cut before leaders are forced to cut staff. "Bonuses, pay increases, ministry budgets and flexible expenses should be cut first," Eugene Mason writes. "Capital spending should be reduced. If the budget adjustments must result in loss of personnel, it’s crazy to leave in money for new Christmas decorations at the expense of a person’s livelihood. Personnel should be the last cut on the list, because when you make those cuts, they’re going to leave wounds."

Mason also mentions one budget item that should not be cut—especially in a time of financial struggle for more people than usual—the benevolence fund. Instead, he says churches should encourage more giving in this specific area. "Consider special offerings with the proceeds going to families in need in the church and surrounding communities," he writes.

These ideas, while focused on churches, are right for all mission-driven organizations. We hope these principles will be helpful as your leadership team faces challenging times and challenging decisions. If we can be of service, please call!

January 22, 2010

Ten Essential Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards

From Bridgestar, the "Ten Basic Responsibilities of Nonprofit Boards."


#1. Determine mission and purpose. It is the board's responsibility to create and review a statement of mission and purpose that articulates the organization's goals, means, and primary constituents served.

#2. Select the chief executive. Boards must reach consensus on the chief executive's responsibilities and undertake a careful search to find the most qualified individual for the position.

#3. Support and evaluate the chief executive. The board should ensure that the chief executive has the moral and professional support he or she needs to further the goals of the organization.

#4. Ensure effective planning. Boards must actively participate in an overall planning process and assist in implementing and monitoring the plan's goals.

#5. Monitor and strengthen programs and services. The board's responsibility is to determine which programs are consistent with the organization's mission and monitor their effectiveness.

#6. Ensure adequate financial resources. One of the board's foremost responsibilities is to secure adequate resources for the organization to fulfill its mission.

#7. Protect assets and provide proper financial oversight. The board must assist in developing the annual budget and ensuring that proper financial controls are in place.

#8. Build a competent board. All boards have a responsibility to articulate prerequisites for candidates, orient new members, and periodically and comprehensively evaluate their own performance.

#9. Ensure legal and ethical integrity. The board is ultimately responsible for adherence to legal standards and ethical norms.

#10. Enhance the organization's public standing. The board should clearly articulate the organization's mission, accomplishments, and goals to the public and garner support from the community.
 
The Board is often one of the most misunderstood and most underutilized resources in a church or nonprofit organization. Call us if we can help you take your board's work from good to great!

Communities Need Locally Focused Nonprofits

Here's an interesting article from the Nonprofit Quarterly:
Too often the focus of the national nonprofit and philanthropic press is big-state and big-city oriented. Technically, McHenry County, Illinois may be in the Chicago metropolitan area, but lying northwest of Chicago, the county is small with a total population the size of a large Chicago neighborhood. Probably not all that many people can locate Woodstock, Illinois, which happens to be the county seat, or pay attention to the comings-and-goings of McHenry County nonprofits. But they should.

The McHenry County Latino Coalition shut down in 2009. A “victim of the recession,” according to one staff member, the Coalition had been largely dependent on state grants which “dried up during the state’s fiscal crisis,” and the organization lacked private funding to make up for the public sector cutbacks. Worth noting is that between 2000 and 2008, the Hispanic population of the County increased from 7.5 percent of 260,000 people to 11.3 percent of 318,000 people, reflecting the large increase in Latino immigration to Illinois during the past decade. Losing the Latino Coalition is no small thing to a rapidly increasing immigrant population that probably needs the kind of services of this small organization in Woodstock, Illinois.
This is a poignant reminder of (a) the importance of community-based organizations to the health of our communities, and (b) the need to diversify funding so that changes in any one source does not put our mission at risk.

January 13, 2010

Ask "Why"

...And Ask It More and More

School tests and poor teachers and exhausted parents – the way the world operates – teach us that there’s one “right” answer to just about every question. So, questioning gets short shrift the older we get. Too often, questioning is seen as threatening or disloyal. But if we want to move our organizations -- and more importantly, our missions! -- forward, we need to ask "why" we do things...and to ask it more and more.

Clarifying purpose is an essential ingrediant to Monster Missions. Need help clarifying yours? Let us know.